Reconnaissance satellites, GPS jamming, ASAT capability, C2 disruption of NATO space-dependent systems
High
High
Limited
Moderate
Limited
N/A
N/A
N/A
Proxy & Asymmetric
Non-state proxy use, irregular warfare, terrorism sponsorship, hybrid operations in NATO member states
High
Moderate
Critical
High
High
Critical
High
Moderate
Air Defence Networks
SAM systems, integrated air defence, A2/AD bubbles — ability to contest NATO air operations and deny airspace access
Critical
Critical
High
Moderate
Moderate
Moderate
Limited
Limited
ISR & Electronic Warfare
Radar coverage, SIGINT collection, GPS/EW jamming, surveillance access — ability to track and contest NATO forces
Critical
High
High
Moderate
Moderate
Limited
Limited
Limited
AGGREGATE ASSESSMENT:
🇷🇺
Russia
6× Crit4× High
🇨🇳
China
4× Crit5× High
🇮🇷
Iran
1× Crit4× High
🇰🇵
North Korea
4× High
🇧🇾
Belarus
3× High
🇱🇧
Hezbollah
1× Crit2× High
🇾🇪
Houthis
3× High
🇵🇸
Hamas
Sources: IISS Military Balance 2024 · RAND Corporation open reports · RUSI Defence Technology Studies · US Congressional Research Service · CSIS · NATO public assessments · SIPRI · Bellingcat · UK MoD Intelligence Updates. For research and policy analysis only. Does not represent official Alliance assessments or classified intelligence.